Link policy
The rules I build authority by.
“Link building” has a deserved reputation problem. This page exists so clients, publishers and anyone I reach out to can see exactly what I will and won't do — in public, in writing.
What I never do
- No PBNsNo private blog networks, no 'powerful network of sites' — owned or rented. If a link exists only to pass authority, it's a liability with a delay on it.
- No hacked or injected linksObviously. Also no 'gray' marketplaces reselling access to compromised or abandoned sites.
- No automated spamNo bots blasting comment sections, forums, or contact forms. No AI-generated outreach carpet-bombing either — every pitch is written for the person receiving it.
- No comment spamBlog comments and forum posts are for participating, not for link drops.
- No fake directoriesNo submissions to directories that exist only to sell listings. Real, moderated, relevant directories (chambers of commerce, industry associations) are a different thing — those are fine.
- No irrelevant bulk linksA hundred links from sites that have nothing to do with your topic don't build authority. Volume is not the metric; relevance is.
What I always do
- Sponsored links are disclosedIf money or product changes hands for a placement, it carries rel="sponsored". No exceptions, no 'everyone does it'.
- Relevance comes firstEvery prospect is scored on topical fit before anything else. A modest, relevant site beats a big irrelevant one.
- Editorial and contextual focusThe links worth earning live inside real content, placed by a real editor, because the content deserved the mention.
- Quality over volumeReporting counts links that matter, not links that exist. Five editorial placements beat fifty directory listings, and the reports say so.
- Assets earn the linksThe engine behind outreach is publishing things worth citing — statistics pages, tools, guides, original data. Outreach introduces the asset; the asset earns the link.
- Client links are protectedConfidential engagements stay confidential. Case studies publish with approval, anonymized or not at all.
Why be this strict?
Because shortcuts transfer the risk to you. When a link scheme gets caught — and the pattern always gets caught eventually — the site that pays the price is yours, not the vendor's. Authority built on relevance and real content has no expiry date and nothing to confess.
If you're comparing providers: ask any of them for their equivalent of this page. The ones who won't write it down are telling you something.
Inherited a messy link profile?
A backlink audit maps every referring domain, flags what's helping, what's dead weight, and what's risky — with a cleanup and growth plan.